Employee Motivation at the Workplace: Case Study of Slovenian Company

  • Matej Gorenšek Družba DISS, distribucija računalniške opreme in trgovina d.o.o., Slovenia
Keywords: self-determination theory, human resource development, reinforcement, work intention, work motivation scale

Abstract

Employee motivation at the workplace is one of the main determinants of the workers' productivity, as well as enticing organizational culture, which in turns affects the organizational performance. The usual approach to motivation is based on the concept of the carrot and the stick, which uses the reward and the punishment as the main tools for shaping the behaviour of employees. On the other hand, self-determination theory is based on the assumption that the employees are motivated when they believe that they are the agents of their own future. This paper investigates employee motivation at the workplace, using the case study of one Slovenian company. The survey covers a wide range of employees divided by gender, age, education and length of employment. The goal is to explore the level of motivation of the employees and discuss it within the context of self-determination theory and human resource development using the survey of employees in a Slovenian company.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amabile, T. M. (1993), “Motivational synergy: toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace”, Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 185-201.

Bellemare, C., Lepage, P., Shearer, B. (2010), “Peer pressure, incentives, and gender: An experimental analysis of motivation in the workplace”, Labour Economics, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 276-283.

Cameron, J., Pierce, W. D. (1994), “Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: a meta analysis“, Review of Educational Research, Vol. 64, No. 3, pp. 363-423.

Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (1980), “Self-determination theory: When mind mediates behavior“, The Journal of Mind and Behavior, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 33-43.

Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (2000), “The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior“, Psychological Inquiry, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 227-268.

Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Ryan, R. M. (1991), “Motivation and education: the self-determination perspective“, Educational Psychologist, Vol. 26, No. 3-4, pp. 325-346.

Gagné, M., Deci, E. L. (2005), “Self-determination theory and work motivation“, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 331-362.

Ganta, V. C. (2014), “Motivation in the workplace to improve the employee performance”, International Journal of Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 221-230.

Landry, A. T., Kindlein, J., Trépanier, S.-G., Forest, J., Zigarmi, D., Houson, D., Brodbeck, F. C. (2016), “Why individuals want money is what matters: Usong self-determination theory to explain the differnetial relationship between motives for making money and employee psychological helath“, Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 226-242.

Maslyn, J. M., Farmer, S. M., Fedor, D. B. (1996), “Failed upward influence attempts: Predicting the nature of subordinate persistence in pursuit of organizational goals”, Group & Organization Management, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 461-480.

Premack, D. (1965), “Reinforcement theory“, in Levine, D. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 13, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp. 123-180.

Ramadanty, S., Martinus, H. (2016), “Organizational communication: communication and motivation in the workplace“, Humaniora, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 77-86.

Ronen, S., Mikulincer, M. (2014), “The foundation of autonomous motivation in the workplace: an attachment perspective“, in Gagné, M. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Work Engagement, Motivation, and Self-determination Theory, Oxford Univeristy Press, New York, pp. 109-126.

Ryan, R., Deci, E. L. (2017), Self-determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development and Wellnes, Guilford Press, New York.

Scalese, E. R. (2001), "What can a college distance education program do to increase persistence and decrease attrition?“, Journal of Instruction Delivery Systems, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 16-20.

Shuck, B., Zigarmi, D., Owen, J. (2015), “Psychological needs, engagement, and work intentions: A Bayesian multi-measurement mediational approach and implications for HRD“, European Journal of Training and Development, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 2-21.

Stone, D. N., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (2009), “Beyond talk: creating autonomous motivation through self-determination theory“, Journal of General Management, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 75-91.

Ţuţu, A., Constantin, T. (2012), “Understanding job performance through persistence and job competency”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 33, pp. 612-616.

Zigarmi, D., Nimon, K. (2011), “A cognitive approach to work intention: The stuff thet emloyee work passion is made of?“, Advances in Developing Human Resources, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 447-461.

Published
2020-09-22
How to Cite
Gorenšek, M. (2020). Employee Motivation at the Workplace: Case Study of Slovenian Company. Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (Online), 6(1), 291-297. Retrieved from https://proceedings.entrenova.org/entrenova/article/view/331
Section
Labor and Demographic Economics